This past Wednesday morning, the
Sovereign Roman Pontiff received at the Vatican the President of the United
States. Nobody cared.
When I first got up that day –
pretty early, too -- the meeting was already concluded. There was no mention of it in the online
version of the Washington Post. None. By evening, two related opinion pieces
appeared, one of which was about what clothes the First Lady had worn. At the same time, the Wall Street Journal had
a synopsis of the event, with photos, for me to examine with my morning coffee.
Regardless of whether you were
breathlessly watching the event, and without really considering the possible
content and effects of a meeting between this particular Pope and this
particular President at this particular time, I hope you realize that the
simple lack of excitement it elicited is itself worthy of wonder.
Only after more than two hundred
years of nationhood, in 1984, did the United States under President Ronald
Reagan establish full diplomatic relations with Holy See. Even then, only great effort and sensitivity
overcame popular and political resistance to the move. It was a necessity of the time to fortify
the shared project of resistance to and eventual demolition of Soviet Communist
domination of Eastern Europe, but opposed by two centuries of American
skepticism and even hostility toward the Holy See as a sovereign entity and
global authority.
Before that, various Presidents had
recognized the indispensability of the Holy See in world emergencies, beginning
with Franklin Roosevelt who circumvented the need for Congressional approval of
an ambassador by sending a “personal representative” to the Holy Father as
Europe spun into war under competing atheist ideologue dictators.
The first incumbent U.S. President
to meet a reigning Pope was Woodrow Wilson, of all people, perhaps the most
anti-Catholic of all twentieth century presidents. It was 1919, and he was hoping to establish a
League of Nations to bring about world peace after the Great War. Gosh, who tipped him off that the Pope in
Rome, in this case Benedict XV, might know something about a league of nations,
and about peace?
After that, next was Dwight
Eisenhower. Of course, John Kennedy
visited the Vatican as well, continuing a progression of Presidents to the
Vatican that has continued to our day.
Every one has called, even Gerald Ford in his brief tenure. Lyndon Johnson was the first President to
receive a Pope in the U.S., when Paul VI came in 1965 to New York for the day,
to speak to the United Nations. Jimmy
Carter was the first President to welcome a Pope to the White House, when John
Paul II arrived on the first of his pilgrimages to the U.S., a tradition that
each of his successors has maintained.
When I was in seminary, President
Clinton came to call at the Vatican. The
Papal Household invited to the Apostolic Palace all U.S. seminarians and
priests in studies. We were eager to see
the Pope, who had been out of circulation for months after being injured in a
fall. But the President, not so
much. We dutifully answered the call of
our Holy Father, who remained secluded, and settled for a speech by the
President.
The only time I have ever met a U.S.
President was in Rome, the night before John Paul II’s funeral, when at a
reception at the US Ambassador’s residence I spoke with Clinton and both Presidents
Bush. Historically unlikely as it is, I
have been a resident of the Capital for most of the past thirty-one years, and my
only direct contact with my own President or his predecessors was brought about
by the Pope.
This past Wednesday morning, the
Sovereign Roman Pontiff received at the Vatican the President of the United
States. Nobody cared. That’s a big change – but is it entirely an
improvement?
Monsignor Smith